- Child Pornography
- Domestic Violence Cases
- Driving under the influence (DUI)
- Drug Crimes
- Federal White Collar Crime
- Health Care Fraud
- International Criminal Law and Extradition
- Internet Crime
- Medical Marijuana
- Misdemeanor / Felony Crimes
- Money Laundering and Racketeering (RICO)
- Professional Licensure Issues
- Sex Crimes & Abuse Allegations
- August 9, 2017
Massachusetts Court Protects Medical Marijuana Use by Employees
- August 7, 2017
Pennsylvania Doctors Now Able to Register to Provide Medical Marijuana Prescriptions
- August 2, 2017
Colorado Court Says Alert from Drug Sniffing Dog is No Longer Enough to Search Car
- July 27, 2017
Medical Marijuana Dispensary Permits Awarded
- July 26, 2017
Recreational Marijuana Use in Nevada Hit a Minor Rough Patch
Eighth Circuit Finds That Two Nearly Simultaneous Drug Sales Are One Offense for Sentencing Purposes
In United States v. Willoughby, 653 F.3d 738 (8th. Cir. 2011), Defendant Willoughby appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, which designated him an armed career criminal under the Armed Career Criminals Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(e) and sentenced him to the ACCA’s mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment.
The presentence report (PSR) prepared in advance of Willoughby’s sentencing recommended that defendant be classified as an armed career criminal, pursuant to the ACCA. Defendant objected to this finding by the PSR, specifically challenging whether his selling marijuana to two different people during one drug deal constituted two offenses that were committed on different occasions as the ACCA required. Reversing, the court rejected the government’s argument that defendant’s sale to an undercover officer and, seconds later, to a confidential informant, constituted “separate and distinct criminal episodes,” instead finding that the sale was, in actuality, one continuous course of conduct.
The court noted that it had never held two convictions to be sufficiently separate and distinct to serve as predicate ACCA convictions where those convictions were for drug offenses that the defendant committed, in essence, simultaneously. The insignificant disparity between the amounts of marijuana that the officer and the confidential informant purchased was insufficient to demonstrate a substantive discontinuity. The court reversed and remanded for resentencing.
Those accused of crimes are entitled to the protections of the Constitution of the United States. An experienced criminal defense attorney ensures a defendant’s rights are protected. If you have been charged with, or convicted of an offense, you still have rights which the Law Offices of Marc Neff can protect. For a confidential consultation, please contact our office at 215-563-9800 or via email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Posted in: Drug Crimes